2017
|
Isabelle Guinaudeau; Tinette Schnatterer Measuring public support for European integration across time and countries: the European mood indicator Journal Article British Journal of Political Science, pp. 1-11, 2017, (Peer Review). Links | BibTeX | Tags: EU, mood, public opinion @article{Guinaudeau2017,
title = { Measuring public support for European integration across time and countries: the European mood indicator },
author = {Isabelle Guinaudeau and Tinette Schnatterer},
doi = {10.1017/S0007123416000776},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-05-08},
journal = {British Journal of Political Science},
pages = {1-11},
note = {Peer Review},
keywords = {EU, mood, public opinion},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
|
Christian Breunig; Emiliano Grossmann; Tinette Schnatterer The Institutional Roots of Policy Agendas Book Chapter Forthcoming Collective book of the Comparative Agendas Project, Forthcoming. BibTeX | Tags: CAP @inbook{Breunig2017,
title = {The Institutional Roots of Policy Agendas},
author = {Christian Breunig and Emiliano Grossmann and Tinette Schnatterer },
year = {2017},
date = {2017-00-00},
booktitle = {Collective book of the Comparative Agendas Project},
keywords = {CAP},
pubstate = {forthcoming},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
|
Luisa Schittny; Tinette Schnatterer Can you hear me? Political communication between MPs and citizens in France and Germany Book Chapter Forthcoming Gabriel, Oscar W; Kerrouche, Eric; Schüttemeyer, Suzanne S (Ed.): Political Representation in France and Germany: Attitudes and Activities of Citizens and MPs, Palgrave, Forthcoming. BibTeX | Tags: France, Germany, MPs @inbook{Schittny2017,
title = {Can you hear me? Political communication between MPs and citizens in France and Germany},
author = {Luisa Schittny and Tinette Schnatterer},
editor = {Oscar W. Gabriel and Eric Kerrouche and Suzanne S. Schüttemeyer},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-00-00},
booktitle = {Political Representation in France and Germany: Attitudes and Activities of Citizens and MPs},
publisher = {Palgrave},
keywords = {France, Germany, MPs},
pubstate = {forthcoming},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
|
2016
|
Tinette Schnatterer Les sénateurs, nouvelle sociologie Journal Article Pouvoirs , numéro 159 , pp. 93-100, 2016. BibTeX | Tags: France @article{Schnatterer2016,
title = {Les sénateurs, nouvelle sociologie},
author = {Tinette Schnatterer},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-00-00},
journal = {Pouvoirs },
volume = {numéro 159},
pages = {93-100},
keywords = {France},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
|
2015
|
Tinette Schnatterer Recension de “Bartle (John), Bellucci (Pablo), eds, Political Parties and Partisanship. Social Identity and individual attitudes, Londres, outledge/ECPR, 2e édition 2015 Miscellaneous Revue Française de Science Politique, 65 (5-6), 2015. BibTeX | Tags: attitudes @misc{Schnatterer2015b,
title = {Recension de “Bartle (John), Bellucci (Pablo), eds, Political Parties and Partisanship. Social Identity and individual attitudes, Londres, outledge/ECPR, 2e édition 2015},
author = {Tinette Schnatterer },
year = {2015},
date = {2015-10-00},
journal = {Revue Française de Science Politique},
volume = {65},
number = {5-6},
howpublished = {Revue Française de Science Politique, 65 (5-6)},
keywords = {attitudes},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Tinette Schnatterer Understudied and underestimated? What determines scientific attention on second chambers? Journal Article French Politics, 13 (3), pp. 302-317, 2015, (Peer Review). Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: bicameralism @article{Schnatterer2015,
title = { Understudied and underestimated? What determines scientific attention on second chambers?},
author = {Tinette Schnatterer},
doi = {10.1057/fp.2015.14},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-09-01},
journal = {French Politics},
volume = {13},
number = {3},
pages = {302-317},
abstract = {In the context of an upsurge in the popularity of bicameralism , the aim of this contribution is to map recent trends in the study of second chambers and to propose some guidelines of thought which should help to overcome existing shortcomings in this field of research. Building on the review of a new database of journal articles on second chambers, I identify three factors that positively influence the attention political scientist accord to second chambers: the classification of a second chamber as strong according to Lijphart, the direct election of its members as well as debates on the reform of the second chamber. This database further enables me to show that the main challenges identified in the literature regarding the research on second chambers are still valid: the quasi-absence of comparative studies and the observation that second chambers are mainly studied in relation with the first chambers and that little research has been conducted on their own (internal) dynamics. Hope can be derived however from new trends in the literature adopting a more actor-entered approach.},
note = {Peer Review},
keywords = {bicameralism},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
In the context of an upsurge in the popularity of bicameralism , the aim of this contribution is to map recent trends in the study of second chambers and to propose some guidelines of thought which should help to overcome existing shortcomings in this field of research. Building on the review of a new database of journal articles on second chambers, I identify three factors that positively influence the attention political scientist accord to second chambers: the classification of a second chamber as strong according to Lijphart, the direct election of its members as well as debates on the reform of the second chamber. This database further enables me to show that the main challenges identified in the literature regarding the research on second chambers are still valid: the quasi-absence of comparative studies and the observation that second chambers are mainly studied in relation with the first chambers and that little research has been conducted on their own (internal) dynamics. Hope can be derived however from new trends in the literature adopting a more actor-entered approach. |
2013
|
Olivier Costa; Tinette Schnatterer; Laure Squarcioni The French constitutional law of 23 July 2008 seen by the MPs: Working or talking parliament? Journal Article The Journal of Legislative Studies, 19 (2), pp. 261-277, 2013, (Peer Review). Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: France @article{CostaSchnatterer2013,
title = {The French constitutional law of 23 July 2008 seen by the MPs: Working or talking parliament?},
author = {Olivier Costa and Tinette Schnatterer and Laure Squarcioni},
doi = {10.1080/13572334.2013.787201},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-06-04},
journal = {The Journal of Legislative Studies},
volume = {19},
number = {2},
pages = {261-277},
abstract = {The French constitutional law of 2008 is, with the modification of 47 articles, the most important revision of the Constitution of the Fifth Republic, at least in quantitative terms. Surprisingly, there have been few attempts to evaluate the effects of the reform, whose official aim was to improve the status of the role of the (traditionally weak) French parliament. The purpose of this contribution is to analyse how MPs themselves judge this reform and its effects, especially on the role of the parliament and its everyday work. To do so we make use of the data of the LEGIPAR research project (September 2009–January 2011): 227 MPs answered closed and open questions about their perception of parliamentary work in face-to-face interviews. The data of the project DEPASTRA (2005–6) allow for a comparison with MPs' positions before the vote of the constitutional revision of 2008.},
note = {Peer Review},
keywords = {France},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
The French constitutional law of 2008 is, with the modification of 47 articles, the most important revision of the Constitution of the Fifth Republic, at least in quantitative terms. Surprisingly, there have been few attempts to evaluate the effects of the reform, whose official aim was to improve the status of the role of the (traditionally weak) French parliament. The purpose of this contribution is to analyse how MPs themselves judge this reform and its effects, especially on the role of the parliament and its everyday work. To do so we make use of the data of the LEGIPAR research project (September 2009–January 2011): 227 MPs answered closed and open questions about their perception of parliamentary work in face-to-face interviews. The data of the project DEPASTRA (2005–6) allow for a comparison with MPs' positions before the vote of the constitutional revision of 2008. |
Sylvain Brouard; Olivier Costa; Eric Kerrouche; Tinette Schnatterer Why do French MPs Focus More on Constituency Work than on Parliamentary Work? Journal Article The Journal of Legislative Studies, 19 (2), pp. 141-159, 2013, (Peer Review). Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: attitudes, France, MPs @article{Brouard2013,
title = {Why do French MPs Focus More on Constituency Work than on Parliamentary Work?},
author = {Sylvain Brouard and Olivier Costa and Eric Kerrouche and Tinette Schnatterer},
doi = {10.1080/13572334.2013.787194 },
year = {2013},
date = {2013-06-01},
journal = {The Journal of Legislative Studies},
volume = {19},
number = {2},
pages = {141-159},
abstract = {The relationship between French members of the National Assembly and citizens is paradoxical. On the one hand, the French political culture, constitution and history favour a very abstract conception of representation: MPs are supposed to act as trustees and collectively to embody the French Nation. On the other hand, they are deeply involved in their constituencies and express a great level of satisfaction being there. In order to understand how French MPs reconcile the national and local dimensions of their mandate, the data gathered through face-to-face interviews with MPs are described. Then a scale analysis is provided in order to sum up the local–national orientations of the MPs. Using this scale, it is possible to test the impact of several variables on the territorial focus of MPs: electoral incentives, political ambition, ideological factors and working conditions at the local and the national level.},
note = {Peer Review},
keywords = {attitudes, France, MPs},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
The relationship between French members of the National Assembly and citizens is paradoxical. On the one hand, the French political culture, constitution and history favour a very abstract conception of representation: MPs are supposed to act as trustees and collectively to embody the French Nation. On the other hand, they are deeply involved in their constituencies and express a great level of satisfaction being there. In order to understand how French MPs reconcile the national and local dimensions of their mandate, the data gathered through face-to-face interviews with MPs are described. Then a scale analysis is provided in order to sum up the local–national orientations of the MPs. Using this scale, it is possible to test the impact of several variables on the territorial focus of MPs: electoral incentives, political ambition, ideological factors and working conditions at the local and the national level. |
2012
|
Olivier Costa; Pierre Lefébure; Olivier Rozenberg; Tinette Schnatterer; Eric Kerrouche Far Away, So Close: Parliament and Citizens in France Journal Article The Journal of Legislative Studies, 18 (3-4: Parliaments and Citizens), pp. 294-313, 2012, (Peer Review). Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: France, MPs @article{Costa2012,
title = {Far Away, So Close: Parliament and Citizens in France},
author = {Olivier Costa and Pierre Lefébure and Olivier Rozenberg and Tinette Schnatterer and Eric Kerrouche},
doi = {10.1080/13572334.2012.706046},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-10-02},
journal = {The Journal of Legislative Studies},
volume = {18},
number = {3-4: Parliaments and Citizens},
pages = {294-313},
abstract = {This article accounts for the paradoxical relationship between French citizens and their MPs. It is well known that the French chambers are among the weakest in Europe since the Constitution of the Fifth Republic restricts their role. The French chambers also suffer from their reputation in the public's opinion, as repeated survey results show. Therefore, despite great efforts to communicate, the National Assembly and the Senate have not succeeded in raising citizens' interest or confidence in their activities. However, at the same time, the representative link in France is characterised by MPs' personal involvement in their constituency which is strengthened by specific institutional incentives (electoral rules, accumulation of mandates, weakness of parties, etc.). Using diverse sets of data, including a survey of French députés' opinions and attitudes, this article provides a picture of contrasting features which are still part of today's debate about parliament.},
note = {Peer Review},
keywords = {France, MPs},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
This article accounts for the paradoxical relationship between French citizens and their MPs. It is well known that the French chambers are among the weakest in Europe since the Constitution of the Fifth Republic restricts their role. The French chambers also suffer from their reputation in the public's opinion, as repeated survey results show. Therefore, despite great efforts to communicate, the National Assembly and the Senate have not succeeded in raising citizens' interest or confidence in their activities. However, at the same time, the representative link in France is characterised by MPs' personal involvement in their constituency which is strengthened by specific institutional incentives (electoral rules, accumulation of mandates, weakness of parties, etc.). Using diverse sets of data, including a survey of French députés' opinions and attitudes, this article provides a picture of contrasting features which are still part of today's debate about parliament. |
Olivier Costa; Tinette Schnatterer; Laure Squarcioni Peut-on revaloriser le Parlement français? Booklet Paris, 2012, ISBN: 978-2-36244-047-2. Links | BibTeX | Tags: France @booklet{CostaSchnattererSyuarcioni2012,
title = {Peut-on revaloriser le Parlement français?},
author = {Olivier Costa and Tinette Schnatterer and Laure Squarcioni},
url = {https://jean-jaures.org/nos-productions/peut-on-revaloriser-le-parlement-francais},
isbn = {978-2-36244-047-2},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-05-23},
address = {Paris},
institution = {Editions Fondation Jean Jaurès},
series = {Les essais},
month = {05},
keywords = {France},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {booklet}
}
|
Sylvain Brouard; Olivier Costa; Eric Kerrouche; Tinette Schnatterer; Laure Squarcioni L’interdiction du cumul des mandats est un impératif, mais ne surestimons pas ses effets Miscellaneous La Revue parlementaire, n° 944, pp. 14‐15, 2012. BibTeX | Tags: France @misc{Brouard2012,
title = {L’interdiction du cumul des mandats est un impératif, mais ne surestimons pas ses effets},
author = {Sylvain Brouard and Olivier Costa and Eric Kerrouche and Tinette Schnatterer and Laure Squarcioni},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-00-00},
howpublished = { La Revue parlementaire, n° 944, pp. 14‐15},
keywords = {France},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Sylvain Brouard; Olivier Costa; Eric Kerrouche; Laure Squarcioni; Tinette Schnatterer Rien ne sert d’accabler les “cumulards” Miscellaneous Le Monde, 5-6 août, 2012. BibTeX | Tags: France @misc{BrouardEtAl2012,
title = {Rien ne sert d’accabler les “cumulards”},
author = {Sylvain Brouard and Olivier Costa and Eric Kerrouche and Laure Squarcioni and Tinette Schnatterer},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-00-00},
howpublished = {Le Monde, 5-6 août},
keywords = {France},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
2011
|
Eric Kerrouche; Sylvain Brouard; Elisa Deiss-Helbig; Tinette Schnatterer Les deux Sénats : mode de scrutin et profil des sénateurs français Journal Article Pôle Sud, (35), 2011. BibTeX | Tags: France @article{Kerrouche2011,
title = {Les deux Sénats : mode de scrutin et profil des sénateurs français},
author = {Eric Kerrouche and Sylvain Brouard and Elisa Deiss-Helbig and Tinette Schnatterer},
year = {2011},
date = {2011-02-00},
journal = {Pôle Sud},
number = {35},
keywords = {France},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
|
0000
|
Tinette Schnatterer Super menteur? La mise en œuvre de la Prestation d’accueil du jeune enfant par le gouvernement Raffarin Unpublished Forthcoming Forthcoming, (article submitted to the Revue française de science politique). BibTeX | Tags: France @unpublished{Schnatterer2017,
title = {Super menteur? La mise en œuvre de la Prestation d’accueil du jeune enfant par le gouvernement Raffarin},
author = {Tinette Schnatterer },
note = {article submitted to the Revue française de science politique},
keywords = {France},
pubstate = {forthcoming},
tppubtype = {unpublished}
}
|
Christian Breunig; Tinette Schnatterer German Policy Agendas – A Data Set and Descriptive Insights Unpublished Forthcoming Forthcoming. BibTeX | Tags: CAP, Germany @unpublished{BreunigSchnatterer2017,
title = {German Policy Agendas – A Data Set and Descriptive Insights},
author = {Christian Breunig and Tinette Schnatterer},
journal = {British Journal of Political Science},
keywords = {CAP, Germany},
pubstate = {forthcoming},
tppubtype = {unpublished}
}
|
Tinette Schnatterer The political agenda of (government) surveys in France and Germany Unpublished Forthcoming Forthcoming, (Publication in preparation (a first version has been presented at the Séminaire Générale, Centre d’Etudes Européennes, Sciences Po Paris, 6th December2016. Accepted for presentation at the annual conference of the Comparative Agendas Project, June 2017 Edinburgh)). BibTeX | Tags: France, Germany, public opinion @unpublished{Schnatterer2017b,
title = {The political agenda of (government) surveys in France and Germany},
author = {Tinette Schnatterer },
note = {Publication in preparation (a first version has been presented at the Séminaire Générale, Centre d’Etudes Européennes, Sciences Po Paris, 6th December2016. Accepted for presentation at the annual conference of the Comparative Agendas Project, June 2017 Edinburgh)},
keywords = {France, Germany, public opinion},
pubstate = {forthcoming},
tppubtype = {unpublished}
}
|
Isabelle Guinaudeau; S. Persico; Tinette Schnatterer European Mood and Partisan Support for European Integration? Unpublished Forthcoming Forthcoming, (Publication in preparation, first version has been presented at the annual conference of the Comparative Agendas Project, Genf June 2016.). BibTeX | Tags: EU, mood @unpublished{GuinaudeauPersicoSchnatterer2017,
title = {European Mood and Partisan Support for European Integration?},
author = {Isabelle Guinaudeau and S. Persico and Tinette Schnatterer },
note = {Publication in preparation, first version has been presented at the annual conference of the Comparative Agendas Project, Genf June 2016.},
keywords = {EU, mood},
pubstate = {forthcoming},
tppubtype = {unpublished}
}
|