Breunig, C., Schnatterer, T. Die politische Agenda Deutschlands. Polit Vierteljahresschr61, 131–149 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-020-00226-6
Our research note on yellow vest among most accessed articles on Cairn
« Enquêter in situ par questionnaire sur une mobilisation. Une étude sur les gilets jaunes. », with Collectif d’enquête sur les Gilets jaunes, Revue française de science politique 69,2019 : 869-892.
Published in December, this research note was still one of the most accessed articles in 2019 on Cairn.info : see ranking
Just published
« Pourquoi et comment contourner la contrainte budgétaire. Population cible, compétition sur enjeu et la promesse tenue de créer la prestation d’accueil du jeune enfant », Gouvernement et action publique, 2019/2 (VOL. 8), p. 35-56.
Two chapters in the new book of the Comparative Agendas Project :
“Political Agendas in Germany”. In BAUMGARTNER (Frank), BREUNIG (Christian) & Grossman (Emiliano)(eds.). Comparative Policy Agendas. Theory, Tools, Data. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2019. 97-104. With C. Breunig.
“Connecting Government Announcements and Public Policy”. In BAUMGARTNER (Frank), BREUNIG (Christian) & Grossman (Emiliano) (eds.),. Comparative Policy Agendas. Theory, Tools, Data. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2019. 300-316. With C. Breunig and E. Grossmann.
CNRS researcher since October 2017
After three years spend at the University of Constance (Germany) – as Post-Doc and Margarete von Wrangell fellow – I have been recruited as a CNRS researcher at the Centre Emile Durkheim, Sciences Po Bordeaux. I can now fully concentrate on my research on the interaction of public opinion and public policy.
Finally out: Article with Isabelle Guinaudeau
Guinaudeau, I., & Schnatterer, T. (2017). Measuring Public Support for European Integration across Time and Countries: The ‘European Mood’ Indicator. British Journal of Political Science, 1-11. doi:10.1017/S0007123416000776
We explain how the public mood approach overcomes the obstacle of heterogeneous data and enables researchers to track public preferences towards European integration across all member states from 1973 to 2014. Our bi-annual “European mood”, computed for each member state, provides an instrument for future comparative research on European politics, enhances scholars’ independence from the availability of individual survey items, and reduces uncertainty about the quality of findings linked to the use of single indicators.